The most irrational thing I was taught in my science class was the direction of magnetism.
I could not accept that when one event to collides with another event at right angles to it,  
it  creates a third event at right angles to both of them.
Thus began my 50 year odyssey from ‘magnets to gravity’ to conquer Space.

My 200 page history of physics follows events relative to Space
from the ancient Baghdad battery 250BC
to the advent of superconductivity 2000AD,
There are over 70 graphics to illuminate many of the fundamental discoveries.

We are taught ‘the law of conservation of energy’ that states that
‘energy can’t be created or destroyed, but it can change from one form to another.
 It’s also known as ‘the first law of thermodynamics’.

We are also taught that Coulomb Energy begins or is created in a positive charge
and ends in a negative chance, which contradicts the first law.

In my Cosmos Coulomb energy is not divine. It must flow through charges;
moreover it cannot be created anywhere else on route.

Energy just circulates.
There areother mirror dimensions which my 150 pages and diagrams explore.

Science is very busy exploring the Cosmos
but if we want to effectively get out there
we must learn how to walk/dance with Coulomb energy
before marching to the beat of the Big Bang Drum.

MAGNETISM
In the days of yore circa 1820, had there not been an incidental compass on the desk beside Oersted’s demonstration of an electric current, science would have forked into a more logical cosmos; at least for a little while.
B4 long, perhaps he would have tired of tinkering with one conductor and added another one parallel to it, and Eureka!; he would have seen them bend in when the current was co-parallel and spread out when anti-parallel.
 Aware of Bernoulli, he would have deduced that the current drags along an ether wind with it. Like winds attract, unlike winds repel.
But alas there was a conjuring compass, and Eureka!; it pointed around the conductor and this became the limb that physics followed, where cause vectors, having perpendicular effect vectors, prevailed over common sense.

The diagrams here show results on the rational fork limb, where magnetism flows parallel with its conductor, not encircling it.

Currents in solenoids spin vortexes of magnetism.
Like spins attract; opposite spins repel.
Iron filings fall along the eyes of a magnet’s mini-vortexes (vortlets)
each vortlet is tangently anti-parallel to its neighbour vortlet therefore repels it

A: Mini paddlewheel impellers track the central magnetic vortex expanding out from both poles of a coreless coil, then feeding back over its waist.
B:. Suspended mini-impellers representing iron filings are caught in the central major vortex wind, which turns them slowly.
This motion chip-starts battery power to the impeller’s mini motors.
These now generate their own mini vortexes or vortlets;
They spin-feed back into the major vortex, and/or spin out into free Space.
Colored smoke reveals all.
C: Shows iron filings aligned in the eyes of vortlet tunnels like Helmholtz filaments.
Note there are no filament tunnels or lines of force without the presence of iron filings.
D: Shows vortexes remaining independent ‘a’; or melding after a short distance ‘b’.
E: Shows the vortexes remain independently confined between opposite poles.

Experiment A and B can simply demonstrate the fluidity of magnetism in any high school laboratory,
Considering what is spinning implies that Space is real; it has embodiment
Bernoulli magnetism obviates the ridiculous right hand screw rules
for the forces on particles moving through magnetic fields/vortexes

The forthright simulation of magnetic fields by the impeller vortex experiments
is a convincing physical alternative/proof to Maxwell’s ethereal perpendicular theory.

Distributed/Sold by: Amazon
Copyrighted with the Library of Congress 2023

Yowah Books is The personal website for the works of Blake Taylor